Total number of Board members 15
Indicate the terminations that occurred on the board of directors during the period being reported:
None.
Executive board members
Total number of executive Board members 4
Total % of Board 26.67 %
Independent External Directors
Total number of proprietary Board members 7
Total % of Board 46.67%
External Independent Board members
Total number of independent board members 4
Total % of board members 26.67%
Indicate whether any director classified as independent receives any amount or benefit from the company or from his/her own group, in any concept other than the remuneration as a board member, or whether he/she maintains or has maintained a business relation with the company or with any company within its group during the last financial year, in his/her own name or as significant shareholder, board member or top executive of a company that maintains or has maintained such relationship.
As the case may be, the board shall include a statement outlining the reasons why it deems that said board member can perform his/her duties in the capacity as independent board member.
Other External Board members
Not applicable.
Explain the reasons why these cannot be considered independent or proprietary, and detail their connections with the company, its executives or shareholders.
Not applicable.
Indicate the variations, if applicable, that occurred during the period in the typology of each board member:
Not applicable.
Explanation of the measures
Four of the members of the Board of Directors are independent and two of them are female. The appointments and remunerations committee promotes the inclusion of females on the board of directors and this is specifically enforced in the category of the independent board members since the rest of the other members that make up the Board are proprietary board members whose selections do not directly depend on the Committee. Thus, Abengoa ensures that the number of women is equal to that of men with regards to the number of independent board members by apply the policy established in Article 1 letters a and b of the Appointments and Remunerations Committee Regulations which specifically outlines the quest for equal opportunities. “Article 1 - Composition and Structure”. […] “The Appointments Committee shall establish procedures and, in the event of new vacancies, shall ensure that:
Moreover, through the company’s Equality Framework Plan, Abengoa has defined a corporate strategy in the field of equal rights between male and female. Thus, all Abengoa companies and work centres take and use this Plan as reference to develop and approve their own. In 2009, to ensure the practice of these values, Abengoa created the Equal Opportunity and Treatment Office (OITO) under the Equality Framework Plan. The mission of this office is to advocate gender equality with the whole organization, promoting, developing and managing the Equality Framework Plan and all plans associated with it.
In addition, the company created the Equal Opportunity and Treatment Committee, presided over by the Human Resources Director and integrated by the HR heads from the various areas and geographical locations of the business as well as by the CSR director as permanent members, for the purpose of worldwide follow-up, and subsequent development of the issues relating to equal opportunity among the male and female employees of Abengoa.
Explanation of the measures
The Appointments and Remunerations Committee objectively and transparently assess the potential candidates based on merits criteria, promoting male and female equality and rejecting all kinds of direct or indirect discrimination based on sex.
The Committee, which includes women in its rank and file, assesses the competences, knowledge and experience that the Board requires, and defines the aptitude and functions sought in the candidates to occupy the vacancy available, evaluating the time and dedication such candidates may require to be able to diligently perform their duties, and then decide by majority vote.
If albeit the measures implemented, as the case may be, the number of female board members is still scarce or non-existent, explain the reasons to justify such scarcity:
Explanation of Reasons
Not applicable.
Shareholders with significant shares are represented by proprietary (dominion) board members who exercise their functions based on the company’s code of conduct and on the rest of the standards and regulations deemed applicable to all members of the board.
Detail any failure to address formal requests for board representation made by shareholders with stakes equal to or exceeding that of others at whose request proprietary members were appointed. If so, explain the reasons why the request was not entertained.
Not applicable.
No.
Not applicable.
No.
Provide details of any relevant relations, as the case may be, other than those contemplated in the previous section, between members of the board of directors and significant shareholders and/or group entities:
Not applicable.
Sí.
The Appointments and Remunerations Committee is the competent body in all cases and provides the Board of Directors with duly substantiated proposals, applying the criteria of independence and professionalism as established in the regulations governing the Board and said Committee.
The performance of the board members and of the executive board members is evaluated on the Appointments Committee’s proposal through substantiated reports filed to the Board during the meeting held in the subsequent first quarter that follows the closing of the previous financial year and after obtaining or at least knowing the accounting estimate for the financial year closing and upon receipt of the auditor’s report since both are essential as evaluation criteria.
The Audit Committee and the Appointment and Remunerations Committee were formed on December 2, 2002 and on February 24, 2003, respectively. On the same date, the board of directors prepared a proposal to amend the bylaws for the purpose of incorporating provisions for the Audit Committee, the proposal for regulating meetings of Shareholders, the partial amendments to board of directors’ regulations and, finally, the internal regulations of the audits committee and of the appointments and remunerations committee, approved by the general shareholders’ meeting held on June 29, 2003.
In February 2004 the composition of both committees was changed to permit independent board members from outside the company to become members of said committees. Consequently, mainly independent non-executive board members joined (with the exception of the coordinator who is member of the Board of Directors and of the Audits Committee) the audits committee and the appointments and remunerations committee, in accordance with the stipulations in the Law on Financial Systems Reform Measures. As a result, the first two independent board members were appointed by the board of directors since there was still, logically, no appointments committee. Said independence is also ratified on annual basis by the Appointments Committee. Once created, it was entrusted with the duty to propose the appointment of board members, and since then it has remained in charge of proposing to the Board of Directors
With regards to the procedures for selecting and appointing independent board members, the appointments and remunerations committee is the body in charge of selecting profiles that best represent the needs of the different interest groups among professionals of different fields and of renowned national and international prestige. The procedure for selecting them is based on merits and on the intention to cover any vacancy with professional profiles that are not linked to any specific interests.
Thus, the appointments and remunerations committee performs annual inspections to verify the sustenance of the conditions met for the appointment of the board member and the nature and typology assigned to said member, and then includes the information in the corporate governance annual report. The appointments committee likewise strives to ensure that the selection procedures for filling in vacancies refrain from implicit biases that may hinder the inclusion of females that fit the required profile into the potential candidates. Its functions also include reporting to the Board of Directors on appointments, re-elections, terminations and remunerations of board members and posts, as well as the general policy of remunerations and incentives for board members and for the senior management and to inform the board of directors in advance of all proposals to be submitted to the general shareholders for the appointment or dismissal of board members, even in cases of co-optation by the said board of directors.
In relation to the above, external auditors issue annual verification reports that are independent from the report issued by the corporate governance of Abengoa S.A., evaluating whether its contents conform both with the recommendations of the report of the special work group on the good governance of listed companies (Unified Code of Good Governance) as well as with the amendments fostered by virtue of Law 2/2011, of 4th March, on Sustainable Economy.
Yes.
If so, explain to what extent the self-assessment has given rise to significant changes in its internal organization and regarding the procedures followed in its activities:
Description of significant changes
There were no significant changes.
Directors are removed from office when the term for which they were appointed comes to an end, and in all other cases deemed appropriate by law, the bylaws or the regulations.
Board Members are obliged to surrender their posts to the board of directors and to formalize their resignation, if the board deems it convenient, in the following cases:
Thus, Article 13 (Board Member Termination) of the Board of Directors Regulations establishes that:
Yes.
Measures to limit risks.
In accordance with the provisions of article 44 bis of the Company’s Bylaws, on December 2, 2002 and on February 24 2003, the board of directors set up the audits committee and the appointments and remunerations committee, respectively.
These committees are vested with the necessary non-delegable powers inherent in the responsibilities assigned them by law, by the bylaws and by their respective internal regulations, which makes them organs of monitoring and supervision of issues within their power.
Both are presided over by independent, non-executive board members, and majority of the members of said committees are independent and non-executive board members.
On December 10, 2007, the board of directors decided to appoint Prof. José B. Terceiro Lomba (representing Aplicaciones Digitales SL), coordinator-board member, as Executive Deputy Chairman of the board of directors, with the consent of all the other board members and especially the independent members.
On October 25, the board of directors also decided to appoint Mr. Manuel Sánchez Ortega as CEO sharing his executive duties with Mr. Felipe Benjumea Llorente. Based on the explanation above, with four executive board members, and an ample majority of independent or external board members, all the decisions taken by the top executive are subject to effective monitoring to ensure that power is not concentrated in the top executive, to boost decision-making and to allow the company governance to function properly.
Indicate and, if so, explain whether rules were established to empower any independent board member to request the convening of a board meeting, or to include new items on the agenda, in order to coordinate and echo the concerns of external board members and to oversee the assessment by the board of directors.
Yes.
Explanation of the rules.
There are currently fifteen members on the board of directors. The Board of Directors Regulations governs the composition, functions and internal organization of the governing body. The company also has an Internal Code of Conduct that bounds the board of directors, the senior management and all other employees deemed affected, by virtue of the positions or powers they may hold in matters relating to the Stock Market. The Shareholders’ General Meeting Regulations governs the formal aspects and the internal system for holding shareholders’ meetings. Lastly, the board of directors is assisted by its audits committee and the appointments and remunerations committee, both of which have their own respective internal regulations. All these rules and regulations, set forth in a consolidated text of the company’s Internal Good Governance Rules, are available on the company’s website: www.abengoa.es and wwww.abengoa.com. Since it was formed, the appointments and remunerations committee has been analysing the structure of the company’s governing body and adapting it to the recommendations of corporate governance, especially to the historic and special configuration of said bodies within Abengoa. In February 2007, based on this analysis, the committee recommended the creation of the post of coordinating director, and the elimination of the Board of Directors’ Advisory Board. The first measure was in order to incorporate the most recent corporate governance recommendations made in Spain in 2006; the second, because it was deemed that said Advisory Board had already performed the duty for which it was originally created and that its coexistence with the corporate bodies could lead to conflicts of power. Both proposals were approved at the Board of Directors’ meeting held in February 2007 and at the General Shareholders’ Meeting held on April 15 of the same year. Thus, Prof. José B. Terceiro was appointed (on behalf of Aplicaciones digitales, S.L.) as coordinating board member, in his capacity as independent member. On a final note, in October 2007 the committee proposed that the board accepts the resignation of Mr. Javier Benjumea Llorente from his post as Deputy Chairman and revokes his delegated powers, and that the board should accept the appointment of a new natural person to represent Abengoa and Focus-Abengoa Foundation in entities or companies where representation is required.
The committee then decided to revisit the study of the number and characteristics of the Deputy Chairman of the board of directors within the current structure of governing bodies.
As a result, the committee thought it necessary that the powers of the Deputy Chairman of Abengoa be restricted to those conferred under the Spanish Corporations Act as regard the organic representation of the company on the one hand, and as balance to the Chairman’s functions on the board of directors, on the other. Thus, it was considered that the coordinating board member – with the functions assigned by the resolutions of the board of directors (February 2007) and the shareholders’ general meeting (April 2007) – was the ideal figure, given the corporate governance recommendations and the company structure, as well as the composition and diversity of its directors. The coordinating board member has already been entrusted with the task of coordinating the concerns and motivations of the other board members, and empowered to convene board meetings and to include new items on the agenda. In its role as the visible protector of the interests of the Board members, it holds more of a de facto than of a de jure kind of representation on the Board, such that it seemed appropriate to confirm and expand this representation by making the post both institutional and organic. For the reasons outlined above, the committee proposed Aplicaciones Digitales, S.L. (Aplidig, represented by Prof José B. Terceiro Lomba), the current coordinating director, as the new Executive Deputy Chairman to the Board of Directors. In addition, and within the functions of organic representation, the executive deputy chairman, jointly with the chairman of the board of directors, has been put forward as the physical representative of Abengoa, in its capacity as the Chair of the Board of the Focus-Abengoa Foundation, as well as in any other foundations and institutions in which the company is or should be represented.
In view of the above, on December 10, 2007, the board of directors agreed to appoint Aplicaciones Digitales, S.L. (represented by Prof José B. Terceiro Lomba), the current coordinating director, as Executive Deputy Chairman of the Board of Directors, and the independent board members gave their unanimous consent to retaining his position as coordinating board member in spite of his new appointment as Executive Deputy Chairman. In addition, and within the functions of organic representation (conferred through a power of attorney granted by the board of directors on July 23, 2007), the Executive Deputy Chairman, together with the Chairman of the Board of Directors, was proposed as joint physical representative of Abengoa, in its capacity as the Chair of the Board of Focus-Abengoa Foundation, and of any other foundations and institutions in which the company is or should be represented.
No.
No.
Yes.
Matters in which there is a deciding vote:
In the event of draws.
No.
No.
None.
The second section of Article 10 of the Regulations of the Board of Directors establishes the following:
“Each board member may confer his/her representation upon another board member without it limiting the number of representations that each may hold for attendance to the board. The representation of the absent board members may be conferred in writing by any means whatsoever, including telegram, telex or telefax addressed to the chair.”
Number of board meetings 16
Number of board meetings without the attendance of the Chairman 0
Indicate the number of meetings held by the different board committees during the financial year:
Identify, as the case may be, the person or persons who certified the company’s individual and consolidated financial statements, for their approval by the Board:
The risks monitoring system, the internal audits services and the audits committee to which the others report, are set up as frequent and regular monitoring and supervision mechanisms that prevent and, if appropriate, resolve potential situations which, if not addressed, could give rise to incorrect accounting treatment. Thus, the audits committee receives regular information from the external auditor on the Audits Plan and on the results of its execution, and ensures that senior management acts on its recommendations.
No.
Appointment and Removal Procedure.
The appointments and remunerations committee makes the proposal.
Is the Secretary to the Board entrusted with the duty of ensuring compliance with the recommendations on good governance?
Yes.
Article 27 of the Board of Directors Regulations establishes the function of the audits committee as being to ensure the independence of the external auditor, which includes ensuring an inspection of the services rendered, the limits on the concentration of the auditor’s business, and in general, other regulations in existence to ensure the independence of the auditors. With regards to financial analysts and investment banks, the company maintains an internal procedure for issuing a request for three offers that may be contracted, at the same time the company prepares a mandate letter which reflects the specific terms of the work contracted. As regards credit rating agencies we have the ratings of three agencies plus their mandate letters.
No.
In the event of disagreements with the outgoing auditor, please provide details:
No.
No.
Details of the procedure.
The Secretary to the Board of Directors exercises the functions legally attributed to that position. At present, the office of secretary and legal consultant are vested in the same person, who is responsible for ensuring that meetings are validly convened and that resolutions are validly adopted on the Board. In particular, he/she advises board members on the legality of the deliberations and motions put forward and on compliance with the Internal Corporate Governance Regulations, which renders him/her the guarantor of the principle of formal and material legality which governs the actions of the Board of Directors. The secretary to the Board of Directors, as a specialized guarantor of the formal and material legality of the board’s conduct, has the full support of the latter to execute its functions with complete independence of criteria and stability, and is responsible for ensuring compliance with the internal regulations on corporate governance. Single-handedly, or through the board members, he/she channels the external consultancy necessary for the due training of the board.
The Board of Directors has access to external, legal or technical consultants, depending on its needs, which may or may not be arbitrated through the Board secretary. The second paragraph of Article 19 of the Regulations of the Board of Directors sets forth that
“Through the Chairperson of the Board of Directors, Board Members shall be empowered to submit a proposal by majority to the Board of Directors to engage the services of a legal, accounting, technical, financial, commercial or any other kind of consultants deemed necessary in the interests of the Company to provide assistance in the exercise of their duties in dealing with specific problems of certain magnitude and complexity linked with the exercise of such duties.”
Yes.
Details of the procedure:
Sending documents and/or making them available at the Board headquarters in advance of Board Meetings. Also, in compliance with the stipulations in recommendations 24 and 25 of the Unified Code of Good Governance, the company prepared a handbook of basic internal regulations applicable to the functions and responsibilities of the board member to be issued to each new board member appointed, to provide vast knowledge of the company and its internal rules.
Yes.
Explain the rule.
Article 13 of the Board of Directors Regulations establishes that “Board members must offer to resign and, if the Board of Directors considers it appropriate, resign under the following circumstances: if deemed to be involved in any of the legally envisaged situations of incompatibility or prohibition.”
Section (p) of Article 14.2 of the same Regulation also establishes the obligation of the board members to inform the company of all legal and administrative claims and of any other claims that, given the magnitude, may severely affect the reputation of the company.
No.
Indicate whether the Board of Directors analysed the case. If the answer is yes, explain the reasons for the decision taken on whether or not the board member should continue to hold its post or, as the case may be, state the actions that the Board of Directors have taken up to the date of this report or the report intended to be issued later.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Indicate whether the governing bodies of the company or its group must be informed of and/or must approve such contracts:
Not applicable.
Audits Committee.
Appointments and Remunerations Committee
Committee name.
Appointments and Remunerations Committee.
Brief description.
To report on and propose the appointment, re-selection or dismissal of members of the Board of Directors and the International Advisory Board and their positions pursuant to the legal provisions, the bylaws and to the general policy of remunerations and incentives for them and for the senior staff.
To issue prior report on all proposals that the Board of Directors may submit to the general shareholders for the appointment or dismissal of board members, even in cases of co-optation by the board of directors itself.
To approve the remuneration policy for the company’s senior staff and for the members of the Board of Directors and the International Advisory Board.
To evaluate the abilities, knowledge and experience necessary on the board, defining the roles and capabilities required of the candidates to fill each vacancy, and deciding on the time and dedication necessary for the proper execution of their duties.
To examine or organize the succession of the chairman and chief executive and, if need be, to issue recommendations to the board to ensure the planned and orderly fashion of said succession.
To report on the appointments and dismissals of senior staff as proposed by the chief executive to the Board.
To report to the Board on the aspect of gender and diversity.
To ensure compliance with the remuneration policy set forth by the company.
To consult the company’s Chairman or chief executive, especially on matters relating to executive board members and senior staff.
To analyse requests that may be issued by any Board Member for the purpose of considering potential candidates to cover Board membership vacancies.
To prepare annual reports on the activities of the Appointments and Remunerations Committee itself and to include such reports in the Management Report.
Committee name.
Audits Committee.
Brief description.
1st In relation to the Internal Monitoring and Reporting Systems:
2nd In relation to external auditors:
Committee name.
Appointments and Remunerations Committee.
Brief description.
The appointments remunerations committee regulations, last amended on December 16, 2013, available on the company’s website and at the CNMV, prepares its own annual report on activities, which is published as part of the Annual Report.
Committee name.
Audits Committee.
Brief description.
The audits committee regulations last amended on December 16, 2013, available on the company’s website and at the CNMV, prepares its own annual report on activities, which is published as part of the Annual Report.
Not applicable.